Near-Death Experiences

Near-death experiences (NDEs) have been reported for much of human history. There is evidence in early Greek and Roman literature, in medieval Western religious literature, ancient literature of Buddhism, and the oral history and folklore of aboriginal societies in Australia, North and South America, and Oceania. The parapsychological literature has discussed NDEs since the nineteenth century, however the popular discussion of these experiences only dates from the early 1970s with the publication of Raymond Moody's best-selling Life After Life (1975). Moody coined the term near-death experience but later regretted its overidentification with physical death and changed the term for these experiences to paranormal deaths.

In Life After Life Moody discussed fifty individual cases of people who, when unconscious and apparently near death and then resuscitated, reported conscious social and psychological experiences. Some people reported sensations of traveling in a dark tunnel. Others reported meetings with bright beings of light or deceased relatives and friends.

Since this early book of casual observations from an author who had been an academic philosopher retrained as a medical practitioner first appeared, other more research-based books have been published. Among these are the behavioral and clinical studies of the psychologist Kenneth Ring ( Life At Death 1980), the cardiologist Michael Sabom ( Recollections of Death 1982), and the psychotherapist Margot Grey ( Return from Death 1985). These were soon followed by other studies from parapsychology, religious studies, sociology, philosophy medicine, and particularly psychiatry.

Among the many studies that have been published since Moody's work include several that have been conducted with children. Childhood NDEs are similar to those reported by adults with some minor differences in phenomenology. Life review, for example, is present for those with a long enough life to recall. Children seem to more often see animals in their NDEs than do adults, suggesting that perhaps animals are one of the few "dead beings" a child might expect to see in such a state. The incidence of NDEs is extremely difficult to assess and depends much on the definition one uses as much as the methodology one employs. In clinical settings, frequently employing cardiac patients, the incidence has been reported in the vicinity of between 9 percent and 18 percent.

Estimates of incidences within the general population have been attempted with surveys. Researchers estimate that approximately 5 percent of the United States population has experienced an NDE, which has led researchers in the U.S. to suggest that some 10 million Americans have had an NDE and in Germany over 3 million people have experienced NDEs.

Some twenty years after the initial observations and theories studies have uncovered and discussed negative NDEs—experiences near death that are less than pleasant for the person in this near-death state. In these accounts, people visit dark places, encounter cruel or taunting beings, and experience feelings of sadness or anxiety. As of 2001 there have been few psychological or social correlates to predict NDEs, either of the positive or negative variety. Gender, age, class, and religious affiliation do not appear to play any role in predicting these experiences. There are some circumstantial correlates, such as surgical or suicide patients who appear not to experience life review compared to those whose injuries or illnesses are of sudden onset. But most of these predictive correlates appear to predict one or more NDE features (e.g. lights, life-reviewed, tunnel sensations, etc.) rather than actual incidence.

The professional and popular profile of NDEs has exploded since the 1970s. It is not immoderate to claim the NDE has become an important and central subject of study and entertainment since the late twentieth century. Moody's book has sold some 12 million copies to date. Film and video consistently employ NDE imagery in their scenes of death—from Flatliners (1990) to What Dreams May Come (1998). Several autobiographical NDE accounts have made the New York Times best-seller list.

The International Association for Near-Death Studies was established in the early 1980s in the United States, with chapters in the United Kingdom, Europe, Canada, and Australia. The association has an academic peer-review journal— Journal of Near-Death Studies —edited from the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Virginia Medical School. Articles about the NDE have appeared in prestigious medical journals including Lancet, British Medical Journal, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, and the American Journal of Psychiatry, among many others.


Understandably, near-death studies have drawn major theoretical debate from several quarters, in particular New Age and skeptical writers. Church leaders and writers are divided. Some side with materialist medical theories, while others argue that such experiences are the work of darker forces. Others allow that such experiences may be revelations into some larger human and perhaps divine dimension.

New Age writers, influenced by modern spiritualism and Eastern religions, have found the afterlife imagery rich in suggestion and confirmation about the eschatological theories of these influences. Skeptics, wary of religious resurgence and supernatural explanations, have tended to scrutinize the case details and research methodologies more carefully. They have tended to favor neuroscientific theories of explanation, particularly those with behavioral and psychobiological models of consciousness.

Among the chief psycho-neuro-biological theories of NDE have been theories of sensory deprivation and cerebral anoxia. Both events have been traced to abnormal temporal lobe seizure activity or the release of ketamines or other hormonal and chemical reactions in the brain. There have been theories about the role of drugs—both medical and illicit—but these took less prominence as more NDEs were reported in situations where these drugs were not implicated. The central problem with biological theories of NDEs is that most of these assume the experience to be closely associated with unconscious states. Increasingly this appears to be less the case.

There has been less effort in surveying the cross-cultural evidence around these experiences, yet it is here where the diversity of NDEs becomes increasingly apparent. What examination there has been in this area seems to indicate that the stereotypical profile of NDEs as an unconscious experience enjoys significant variation. Experients (people who experience NDEs) from hunter-gatherer societies, for example, tend not to report tunnel sensation or life review—an important observation that could undermine the credibility of attempts to create particular neurophysiological theories based up on these two details.

However, taking the stereotypical NDE profile of sensations of euphoria, out-of-body experience, tunnel sensation, life review, and meetings with beings of light or deceased people has also opened up another model of near-death experiences as experiences not near death and not unconscious. Here, similar phenomenology has been reported in connection with shamanic initiation rites, castaway experiences, experiences of trapped miners, mountaineering accidents, and bereavement experiences.

Further complicating the question of causation is the finding that near-deathlike experiences may be induced in therapeutic settings through use of eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) techniques in psychotherapy. During grief therapy using EMDR techniques, patients may experience reunion with deceased relatives and friends, tunnel sensation, experiences of light and peace, and the observation of supernatural vistas. Near-death experiences are no longer phenomena simply associated with unconscious experiences of cardiac arrest and resultant resuscitation.

The examination of these kinds of conscious experiences has lead to the recognition of two important points. First, NDE phenomenology is not always associated with real, physical experiences of death but merely the expectation of dying and loss. Second, NDE phenomenology is associated with conscious as well as unconscious experience. These observations immediately call into question theories of NDE that rely on unconscious cases and that employ cerebral anoxia (oxygen deprivation of the brain) as their primary mechanism of causation. Any physiological theories of NDE must take into account that the phenomenology spans conscious and unconscious experiences and enjoys significant cultural variation.

Notwithstanding these qualifications, it is important to note that physiological theories have no more power in undermining supernatural explanations than New Age theories have of establishing them. The issue of whether consciousness is merely a function of physical processes or is mediated by them is not settled by biological debate, least of all one with obvious materialist assumptions.

The issue of the nature of consciousness and death, specifically the fate of consciousness beyond death, is a philosophical question. It is not settled by empirical claims if only because all scientific conclusions are subject to revision. And because they are ipso facto empiricist models of explanation, such models are biased against theories of experience not subject to these types of tests and proofs.

The nature of death or of consciousness is also not settled by logical argument if only because there are always better arguments to be made, and will need to be made, by the changeable requirements of a diverse and evolving professional and academic culture. The arguments about human survival are made in the service of persuasion and are rarely definitive except to those with faith—in religious or scientific, materialist ideas. Evidence and argument must have a context to be persuasive within. They are most effective among a community of believers. This remains true of twenty-first-century skeptics and religious adherents.

Even away from the ideological posturing of the more extreme opinions from religion and science, NDEs are not readily explained by current neurophysiology. Some researchers have argued that drugs may be implicated, but often they are

Some people who have had near-death experiences (NDEs) reported an experience of life review or the sight of supernatural vistas such as cities or blissful rural scenes of beauty. In these early accounts nearly every NDE was reported to have feelings of great peace and happiness, even euphoria. GEORGE D. LEPP/CORBIS
Some people who have had near-death experiences (NDEs) reported an experience of life review or the sight of supernatural vistas such as cities or blissful rural scenes of beauty. In these early accounts nearly every NDE was reported to have feelings of great peace and happiness, even euphoria.
not. Other researchers have argued that tunnel sensation is due to the side effects of oxygen deprivation to the brain, but NDEs occur to people who are fully conscious as well.

Personality changes linked to disturbances to temporal lobe, such as religiosity, philosophical pursuits, widening affect and so on, have been associated with obsessiveness, humorlessness, anger, and sadness—qualities not normally associated with NDEs. There have been claims that NDEs have occurred when patients were connected with electroencephalograph (EEG) machines, but these claims were subsequently proven false. There are now documented cases, but the reliability and validity issues behind measurement of brain activity are far from certain and so such cases are intriguing at best and irrelevant at worse.

What scientists are able to say is that the research to date has provided fruitful indicators of the type of brain/consciousness models that are needed to further explore and understand the physiological basis of these experiences. Advances in this scientific area will undoubtedly supply researchers with a basic benchmark for understanding the broad biological context of NDEs but they do not solve, and probably will never solve, the diverse incidents and experiences that are regularly reported near death. In this context, the best answer researchers will ever have when it comes to the question of whether or not NDEs represent evidence of human survival of death is that perhaps they might, but rarely conclusively.

Implications of Near-Death Experiences

Aside from the professional debates about the causes of NDEs there lies a major discussion about their consequences. Those whose NDEs are clinically derived from close physical encounters with death often report changed values and lifestyles. Those whose NDEs are derived from initiation rites, castaway experiences, or mining accidents also report life changes. These changes to values or lifestyles are associated with both positive and negative NDEs, although such changes may be dissimilar from each other. For people whose NDE is a positive experience, many report a lessening or disappearance of any personal fear of death. These people also report a greater "love of humanity," often expressed as a desire to change career or work aspirations so as to work for the good of others.

There is a greater expressed desire to be more tolerant or patient of human foibles and a greater appreciation for the interconnectedness of all living things. Those who encounter near-death experiences report an increase in their interest in spirituality but often expressly distinguish this from a church-going religiosity. Many other people have reported an increased interest in education or higher learning. This is often associated with a simple post-NDE desire for learning, but also for retraining into some kind of helping profession to meet their newly found ambition to "help others." People who have experienced a negative NDE will often, understandably, report a greater fear of death, and are more likely than those with positive experiences to return to church attendance.

There has been some suggestion that those who experience near-death experiences encounter a new type of consciousness. NDEs create human beings that have higher spiritual values and such people are important to an evolution of improved social and political values within humanity. But it is not at all clear that the research on post–NDE changes in individuals reflects genuine changes or simply new attitudes and hopes in these people. People often report stigma and rejection of their new attitudes and values, while many others are even skeptical of the actual NDE itself. Many near-death participants have reported being withdrawn or depressed about such responses and more than one book has recorded that the diverse reactions of people and their networks have lead to job loss and marital breakdown.

It appears that experiences of light and love near death no more makes a better person than any other experience of crisis. Experiences that are testing and challenging to one's personal values and character can transform one for the better or may destroy that person. But it is not the experience that holds the key, but one's capacity to learn and be changed by that experience. In this way, NDEs occupy similar psychiatric and social space as bereavement, job loss, poverty, personal failure, and social rejection. They may be sufficient but not guaranteed grounds for personal growth and change.

As mentioned previously, the NDE is not confined to people near death or loss. It may also take "passengers." In his book The Last Laugh (1999), Moody calls these experiences "empathic," "conjoint," or "mutual" NDEs. People caring for dying people may report some actual NDE phenomenology—experiences of light, out-of-body experiences, meeting supernatural or deceased beings, and enjoying sensations of peace and joy. These are part of a discreet subset of near-death phenomenology such as shared near-death visions, shared near-death experiences, and shared illness experiences. They have been reported in early-nineteenth-century parapsychology literature and in late-twentieth-century near-death studies and literature.

The social and psychological pattern for their appearance seems to be a personal journey that takes the dying or ill person through similar stages of social isolation and reintegration. The number of reported cases of shared NDE are small and their documentation inconsistent in thoroughness. Yet, such cases continue to strengthen the importance of the social and psychological nature and complexity of NDEs. There can be no doubt that biological factors play a role but it may yet turn out to be a diverse mediating one, subject to equally complex social factors. Just as the physiology of smiling is no key to the secret of happiness, the physiology of NDEs may not unlock the secret of the fate of the soul nor even of its whereabouts.

The problem of NDEs appears to tread similar territory to other problems of social and psychological marginalization. In that space, NDEs are areas of contested social meanings between modern-day "experts" of one persuasion or another, and individuals trying to make sense of experiences for which science and religion have poorly prepared them. Without a settled, agreed-upon set of meanings, the status of NDEs, their passengers, and their public relationships with the outside world will always be ambiguous and problematic.

See also: Communication with the Dead ; Communication with the Dying ; Immortality ; Moment of Death ; Reincarnation


Anderson, John. Life, Death and Beyond. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1980.

Becker, Carl. "The Centrality of Near-Death Experiences in Chinese Pure Land Buddhism." Anabiosis 1 (1981): 154–171.

Blackmore, Susan. Dying to Live: Science and the Near-Death Experience. London: Grafton, 1993. Botkin, Allan. "The Induction of After-Death Communications Utilizing Eye-Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: A New Discovery." Journal of Near-Death Studies 18, no. 3 (2000):181–209.

Flynn, Charles. After the Beyond: Human Transformation and the Near-Death Experience. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.

Gallup, George. Adventures in Immortality. London: Souvenir, 1982.

Grey, Margot. Return from Death: An Exploration of the Near-Death Experience. London: Arkana, 1985.

Greyson, Bruce. "The Incidence of Near-Death Experiences." Medicine and Psychiatry (December 1998):92–99.

Greyson, Bruce. "A Typology of Near-Death Experiences." American Journal of Psychiatry 142 (1985):967–969.

Greyson, Bruce, and Nancy Evans-Bush. "Distressing Near-Death Experiences." Psychiatry 55 (1992):95–110.

Hick, John. Death and Eternal Life. London: Collins, 1976.

Kellehear, Allan. Experiences near Death: Beyond Medicine and Religion. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Kung, Hans. Eternal Life? London: Collins, 1984.

Lorimer, David. Whole in One: The Near-Death Experience and the Ethic of Interconnectedness. London: Penguin, 1990.

Moody, Raymond. The Last Laugh: A New Philosophy of Near-Death Experiences, Apparitions, and the Paranormal. Charlottesville, VA: Hampton Roads Publishing, 1999.

Moody, Raymond. Life After Life. New York: Bantam, 1975.

Morse, Melvin. Closer to the Light: Learning from Children's Near-Death Experiences. New York: Villard Books, 1990.

Rawlings, Maurice. Before Death Comes. London: Sheldon Press, 1980.

Ring, Kenneth. Life At Death: A Scientific Investigation of the Near-Death Experience. New York: Coward, McCann and Geoghegan, 1980.

Ritchie, George. Return from Tomorrow. Grand Rapids, MI: Fleming H. Revell, 1978.

Sabom, Michael. Recollections of Death: A Medical Investigation. New York: Harper and Row, 1982.

Shapiro, Francis. Eye-Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: Principles, Processes and Procedures. New York: Guilford, 1995.

Sutherland, Cherie. Transformed by the Light: Life After Near-Death Experiences. New York: Bantam, 1992.

Zaleski, Carol. Otherworld Journeys. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.


User Contributions:

james watts
Report this comment as inappropriate
Mar 10, 2007 @ 8:08 am
as a christian i believe those beings of light could have been angels

Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:


Near-Death Experiences forum